Small-Z residue — q3
Nothing here is a dent. Best published integer bound at is still Lieb .
Hydrogen uniqueness is Lieb 1984 and is not claimed.
Replay:
python3 problems/simon-ionization-excess/compute/q3/work/smallz_replay.py
python3 problems/simon-ionization-excess/compute/q3/work/smallz_check.py
Opened this session: Nam 1009.2367v3 HTML, HPS 2504.18487v1 HTML Prop. 2.4–2.5 and (7.10), BGB 2511.07582v1 HTML (only for ).
Published envelopes at
Same arithmetic as q2 envelopes.py, now including .
Integer exclusion: means at most the largest integer
strictly below .
| Lieb | Nam | HPS printed / q1 | HPS printed / q1 | best integer | unsettled | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 5 | 6.219763 | 6.143580 / 6.134760 | n/a | ||
| 3 | 7 | 7.986749 | 7.890379 / 7.880283 | n/a | ||
| 4 | 9 | 9.642203 | 9.527134 / 9.516022 | 10.801690 / 10.788991 | ||
| 5 | 11 | 11.229928 | 11.097063 / 11.085093 | 12.388782 / 12.375102 | ||
| 6 | 13 | 12.771362 | 12.621318 / 12.608598 | 13.917968 / 13.903431 |
Nam states that when . HPS states that Prop. 2.4 improves Lieb for . Both hold as real comparisons at , and both still have , so they exclude no extra integer. BGB’s formula at is about and is not applicable.
Zhislin gives .
One finite- try
HPS Prop. 2.4 maximises the remainder on . At a fixed , Lieb is . That is increasing for , so the max is the right endpoint. The -local envelope is at and at : below as reals, still above . Same integers as Lieb.
Direct HPS (7.10) and the form (7.6) at the Lieb edge , using q1’s for (printed is weaker): no contradiction. Closest gap is , : .
Nam Lemma 1 / Prop. 1 likewise: published lowers sit below the kinetic right-hand side (at , about ).
Pair geometry, kinetic dropped. Tetrahedron still blocks at (). Five vertices of the regular octahedron give
because : the pair ratio cannot exclude at .
The full octahedron has (); a prism scan stays above . Not a dent.
Status
Residue. No verifier-plus-certificate beats a published integer envelope at a concrete .