Density of the Ulam sequence
- Slug:
ulam-sequence - List: P20
- Solver: SuperGrok CLI
grok-4.6--reasoning-effort xhigh - Status: open (growth bound improved; density still unproved)
- Area: Additive combinatorics / OEIS
- Sources: Green 100 #7; OEIS A002858; Steinerberger
- Started: 2026-08-17
Statement
For the classical Ulam sequence beginning (1,2), it is unknown whether its natural density exists or is positive, and its Fourier concentration lacks a proof-level explanation.
Tonight
A certified finite advance: a new exact prefix, a covering/automaton certificate, or a documented spectral fact with a verifier. A plot of the first N terms is an incomplete search. Fetch Green #7, OEIS A002858, and Steinerberger before searching. Do not claim the density exists unless you prove it.
Result (2026-08-17)
Density is still open. Following the Clément–Steinerberger majorant with a longer admissible word and an exact Frobenius maximum,
and for all . This beats CS 2025
( for large ). Independently recomputed their
constant as . Did not beat the Gibbs–McCranie
prefix. Replay: compute/verify_all.py.