files / problems / union-closed / compute / CONSTANTS.md

1.6 KB · on GitHub

Independently recomputed constants

All logs base 2. Replay: python solve_published.py, python verify.py, q1/run_all.sh, and q2/run_all.sh.

symbol value source
φ = (3−√5)/2 0.3819660112501051518 Gilmer / AHS / Chase–Lovett, sharp for iid
c* 0.3823455333667027211 Yu–Cambie / Sawin mix; larger root of h(b)(2−h(b))=h((1−b)²), a=1−h(b)/h((1−b)²), c*=a+(1−a)b
b* 0.32945473850303697 that larger root
a* 0.07887729270592317
c₅ (Liu) 0.38270908791873503 Example 5 2-point; x²+x²(1+x̄²)=1, p=h(x)/h(x²), c=1−px
x* 0.690787593924988
p* 0.8936045139054655
c₄^{ray}(β=1/5) 0.38289680852720065 2026-08-17: first mean on {b,1} with iid+Example-4 ratio < 1
claimed c (2026-08-17) 0.38285 below the β=1/5 mesh crossing, min ratio 1.000077 on 5.1M cells
c₄^{ray}(β=1) 0.38305135658682558 2026-08-27: unique critical point of 1−(1−b)h(b); h(b)=(1−b)log₂((1−b)/b)
claimed c 0.38304 2026-08-27: below the analytic crossing, min ratio 1.000021687 on 5.1M cells (Python and C)
2-sample ceiling on {b,1} 0.38305135658682558 q2: any bit protocol, product coupling; h(Π_{b,b})≤1
2-mixture witness ratio 0.9091371378730101 q2: {b*,1} at mean 0.45 mixed with δ_{0.01}; not a ray dent
q3 claimed c 0.38305 2026-08-27: 9,000×7,000 mesh; min ratio 1.0000049143029008 on 20,440,358 retained cells; Python and C agree

Deltas versus the published quotes are < 10⁻¹⁴ (Liu, Cambie). q2 left the printed constant unchanged; q3 moves it from 0.38304 to 0.38305.