Walkthrough — a long gap in a dilate modulo a prime
Discovery notes, not a paper. Empty sections would mean not done.
- Problem:
problems/long-gap-dilate - Quest: Green 100 #32, improve Shakan’s universal 2
- Model: SuperGrok CLI
grok-4.6 - Date: 2026-08-17
- Argument status: no certified . Leftover is a verified SAT table through , a degree-wall (homogeneous and rising-factorial), a exact , SAT upper bounds at , and failed lifts
- Problem status: open
0. What was actually missing
The missing degree of freedom was not a SAT solver and not a larger small-prime table. Shakan’s published argument already gives
for every with . The 2 is the sum of two degree bounds on a Rédei slice . At the scale with that slice has no middle coefficients forced to vanish. The interval that defines a gap is discarded when the product is replaced by its top homogeneous part . Whatever beats 2 has to keep that interval, or leave Rédei entirely.
Isolated for cannot be that argument.
1. False starts (named obstacles)
The list citation. The proposed-50 source
arXiv:2205.14038, “On higher moments of Fourier coefficients”, is a
quant-ph paper. The result Green cites is Shakan,
arXiv:2004.14828, SIDMA 34 (2020).
Fetched first.
Tweaking the Wronskian. Cancelled leading terms give instead of . Discrete derivatives of rising factorials do the same comparison. Both rearrange . Not a leading constant.
Assuming . Legal by translation. Then . At this is still larger than , so the half of Alon does not drop.
Dirichlet clustering. Any fixed-size -set has a dilate of diameter , so . This is Green’s Bohr-set remark. At the box principle needs more than boxes. No improvement.
Energy / Freiman. makes some dilate an interval and the gap is , enormous. Random / Sidon / small multiplicative subgroups have , also enormous. The sets that could keep the leading constant near 2 are exactly the ones the polynomial method already treats. Rank-2 Bohr sets collapse to diameter .
Cauchy–Schwarz on occupancies. and over pairs recover only the pigeonhole . Pairwise inclusion-exclusion with a matching of is the same.
Singer as a family. For the Singer set in matches the SAT value of . At , , it has gap 90 against Shakan 32 (ratio ). Not a near-extremal family.
Calling the SAT table a new bound. For one has . House rule: isolated small- tables are not a universal . Extra above Shakan is order on this range; that could be a hidden (which would be leading 3 at ) or slack that dies.
2. The useful failure
The homogeneous Rédei slice is a wall, not a knob. Once , is an identity that a general degree- polynomial can satisfy for dimension reasons. There is nothing left to contradict. The calculation that looks like it might give is the same calculation with no hypotheses left.
That failure is useful because it names the discarded information: is an interval, is a product of rising factorials, and the lower Stirling terms are exactly what the top-degree slice throws away. A Python expansion of the full vanishes on at the same the gap definition requires. The extra terms do not automatically vanish earlier.
3. The click
Two translations, then a stop.
First: is the length of the longest arithmetic progression in the complement. Green #32 is the hitting-set statement “every -set misses some -AP”. Shakan is . A new bound is for some fixed .
Second: the only published proof of the 2 uses a homogeneous slice that is information-theoretically unable to see . Beating 2 is a different argument, or a use of the rising factorials that this session did not find.
There is no third click that produces a proof.
4. The argument, in the order it was found
- Fetch Green #32 and Shakan (the real arXiv id). Record the published constant 2.
- Re-derive the Wronskian. Confirm that in is forced by the slice, and that makes the middle-coefficient list empty.
- Write the Dirichlet bound and check it against exact and : the ratios climb toward 3 and 4, as they should, and this does not speak to .
- Encode “exists an -set hitting every -AP” in SAT, binary- search , get exact through . Independently recompute every witness. Enumerate all affine-normalised -sets through ; they match SAT.
- Hunt a family (grids, squares, subgroups, Singer, jitter, greedy hitting sets, local search). None approaches 2 at . Local-search upper bounds live at ratio –.
- Stop before calling the finite table a universal constant.
5. Computer search
compute/certs/sat_G.jsonl— exact , witnesses, Glucose logs of the binary search.compute/certs/sat_G_verified.json— independent recomputation of every witness gap.compute/certs/enum_diagonal.json— brute-force through .compute/certs/G_n3.json,G_n4.jsonl,G_n5.jsonl— fixed- exact values.compute/certs/local_upper.jsonl,constructions.jsonl,singer.json,greedy_hit.json— upper bounds / families.figures/sat_ratios.png— and against Shakan’s 2.compute/verify.py— Shakan on every proper nonempty subset for , and on the listed constructions.
Replay:
cd problems/long-gap-dilate
sh compute/run_all.sh
6. What is proved vs still open
Proved, published, not improved. Shakan: every of size has a dilate missing consecutive residues. For this is a gap of . The leading constant 2 is the record.
Proved, elementary, already in Green’s comments. For each fixed , Dirichlet gives , so the Shakan constant is not sharp at bounded size. This is the regime .
Certified computation, not a bound. For every prime and , , with an independently checked witness of size and (for ) an exhaustive proof that nothing smaller-gap exists. is SAT plus Cadical unsat, not enum. This is a finite list.
Still open. Green #32: is there a universal , or even a universal , such that every of size has a dilate missing ? No such is proved here. No construction shows that is sharp either.
7. 2026-08-27 continuation
The unused handle was named: keep the interval in . Expanding it does not help. On the stored witnesses the Alon degrees of the rising equal the worst-case , and at the actual one already has . The extra Stirling slice is the derivative of the top slice. There is nothing left in that polynomial to contradict at .
SAT past is cheap on the SAT side. Cadical finished the UNSAT at for in 165s, so is exact. , , are still only witnesses. One extra exact row does not lift to a universal . Constructions through drift up to ratio –, not down to . The new ratios stay near , same as .
Replay: sh problems/long-gap-dilate/compute/run_all.sh and
cd problems/long-gap-dilate/compute/q1 && ./run_all.sh.